![]() |
the international federation of film critics | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | ||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Palm Springs 2007 Lars von Trier's "The Boss of It All"
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Kristoffer struggles to get a Method-like grip on his character, withdrawing into a trance to discover who Svend is and what Svend would do. Difficulties arise when it develops that Ravn has created a different Svend for each of the six senior employees, each answering to the employee's particular needs and fantasies. The comedy, dry beyond dry, comes from Svend's attempts to be what his people want him to be: A father figure to one, a passionate lover to another, a punching bag to a third. In a fascinating way, the character combines the attributes of both the actor and the director; he's a puppet paid to be manipulated by others, at the same time he's a leader whose job it is to impose his will and vision.
But for The Boss of It All, von Trier has abandoned his directorial will, or at least a portion of it, to a device he calls "Automavision" — apparently a sort of computer controlled camera mount that randomly disrupts the framing, knocking the actors nearly out of the frame at one moment, focusing on utterly irrelevant details at another. The jittery camerawork of the last few features is gone, as are the smeary outlines of digital video; instead, The Boss of It All has been photographed on 16mm film by a camera firmly set on a tripod. The film seems to be retreating into a kind of technical-mechanical impersonality: Where von Trier's own fingerprints have been visible, almost literally, on every hand-held shot of his previous two films (he works as his own camera operator), the new film strives for an antiseptic, impersonal visual style. The computer-generated framing diminishes the role of the director at the same time it destroys the primacy of the actor. The mechanical eye of Automavision is not, like the human eye, instinctively drawn to the human face, but fixes instead on objects and emptiness — the spaces beyond or above the performer. The machine is not concerned with humanity, just as the businessman is not concerned with the fate of his employees.
There's a lot going on here for a movie that announces itself as a bagatelle — a movie, von Trier promises in his voice-over, that you'll forget before you get home. But the fascination of von Trier's cinema is always to be found in its deliberate contradictions, in the paradoxes within paradoxes that he constructs so carefully and leaves to the audience to unpack and unravel. As with all of von Trier's films, there will be viewers who enjoy the puzzles posed by his work, and viewers who will resent the lack of formal certainty and moral clarity. But a von Trier movie that everyone liked would be, by von Trier's own definition, a failure. And a failure is one thing The Boss of It All certainly and clearly is not.
Dave Kehr is the DVD critic of the "New York Times". He has previously been a film critic for the "Chicago Reader", "Chicago Tribune" and the "The New York Daily News".
recent festivals |
Palm Springs 2007
|