![]() |
the international federation of film critics | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cottbus 2007"Opium — A Madwoman's Diary":
|
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
In many ways, Opium — A Madwoman's Diary plays as a vivid textbook on the history of madness — or, to be more precise, on the "scientific" way we attempt to treat it. The rich production design turns the mental hospital into a museum of abandoned therapies and experimental treatments for the untreatable — violent approaches relying on nothing more than a hammer and a chisel, or cold water, or bursts of electricity. On the other hand ... some of those methods are still in use. The film questions all of modern medicine's peaks and breakthroughs, while acknowledging at the same time that we haven't come up with anything better. The walls around mental hospitals are, unfortunately, the same height today as they were a century ago. Of course, there are some changes: Thanks to all those little blue and red pills, the patients inside those walls are much quieter now.
Let's return to Szász' Opium. The brave decision of giving the main roles to Kirsti Stubø and Ulrich Thomsen — Scanadanavians, rather than native Hungarian speakers — mandated certain conditions, such as the use of a narrator and the style of the camera work. Numerous close-ups force us to focus on the actors' eyes, rather than their lips; the average non-Hungarian, used to reading subtitles, will never notice the actors are not native speakers. Director Szász considered his stars the perfect choice, in Thomsen, he was completely right. The actor's calm, cold face — hiding the apparent chaos behind obviously cynical and brutal eyes — is ideal for the role. On the other hand, Stubø seems too modern for her role. Her performance is powerful — at times, even breathtaking — but too often she looks like a model, an imported symbol from the 21st century.
The conclusion is, in a way, predictable. Opium – A Madwoman's Diary is a memorable, very stylized film with strong leading roles. While the idea behind it sometimes outshines the piece as a whole, this film shouldn't be dismissed as superficial or pretentious. The compelling, metaphorically complex story dares to examine an area that is too often dismissed or simply ignored: The grey area between sanity and madness.
Hrvoje Puksec is a freelance film critic and journalist from Croatia. He works for the Croatian film clubs' association (www.film.hr), as well as for "Vijenac" and Croatian radio and television.
recent festivals |
Cottbus 2007
|