 |
| coming soon
|
|
 |
Buenos Aires 2004
Airplanes and Bowling Pins:
New Films From Argentina
by Scott Foundas
In
concept, it sounds like a potential self-indulgent vanity project of Jaglomesque
proportions: A docudrama about the fatal 1999 crash of a Boeing 737 plane
operated by discount Argentinean airline LAPA — written by, directed
by and starring one Enrique Piñeyro, himself a former LAPA pilot
and the whistle-blower who brought a hefty house of legal cards tumbling
down on the now-defunct carrier. Yet, Whisky Romeo Zulu, which premiered
in the official competition of the 6th Buenos Aires International Festival
of Independent Cinema (and went on to win the festival’s Audience
Award) emerges as a stirring, if obvious piece of agitprop that achieves
exactly what it sets out to achieve. That is to say it works the audience
up into an angry lather, and you emerge from the theater never wanting
to set foot on another airplane again — at least, not if you feel
you may have paid less than fair market value for the ticket. It’s
a movie that gets people talking, and not long after it’s first
press screening in Buenos Aires, even the film’s dissenters could
be found swapping stories about their own discomforting air-travel experiences.
Set both in the present and the not-too-distant past, this
Silkwood of the skies intercuts the advancing inquiry into LAPA’s
highly questionable safety and maintenance practices with scenes depicting
Piñeyro’s own unsuccessful crusade to draw attention to the
crisis before disaster strikes. Of course, we’ve seen this tale
before and we know where it’s going. Piñeyro’s cries
of «wolf» invariably fall on deaf ears and end up getting
him laid off from his job; meanwhile, the attorney leading the post-crash
investigation finds himself subject to menacing threats from unseen assailants
including, at one point, a note that actually says «You might end
up floating in the river.» At such moments, Whisky Romeo Zulu teeters
precariously on the brink of self-parody. At others — most notably,
a series of gooey, nostalgic flashbacks to Piñeyro’s childhood
that play like outtakes from Cinema Paradiso — it does more than
just teeter. But the picture’s pulpy, polemical thrust, combined
with Piñeyro’s doggedly earnest performance, keeps the whole
enterprise aloft, and prevents it from devolving into the fatuous navel-gazing
its novice maker’s multihyphenate status might suggest.
Whisky Romeo Zulu arrived in Buenos Aires already rumored
to be one of the most expensive films ever produced in Argentina, and
it looks it. The widescreen, steadicam-intensive images have the well-lit
sheen of mainstream Hollywood cinema. And in some ways, Piñeyro
does Hollywood one better: The commercial airliners that fill his movie’s
frames are really there — not added in digitally after the fact
— and there are many scenes shot from inside the cabins of those
real planes, really in flight, with Piñeyro himself at the helm.
In fact, part of what’s compelling about Whisky Romeo Zulu is the
unique tension that exists between Piñeyro’s interest in
making a widely accessible thriller decked out with the requisite big
toys and his desire to confront his own private, lingering demons in a
highly personal way. It suggests what a Michael Bay production might look
like if Bay finally wised up and made a movie that meant something to
him.
* * *
«In
a normal company, we wouldn’t be discussing this,» notes Piñeyro
to another concerned colleague mid-way though Whisky Romeo Zulu. At which
point, the colleague replies, «In a normal country, we wouldn’t
be discussing this.» Harsh words for harsh times, in a nation still
feeling the aftershocks of its 2002 economic crisis. So, it’s hardly
surprising that conversations similar to the one quoted above echoed throughout
a whole raft of new Argentinean films premiered at Buenos Aires this year.
In particular, there was Alejo Hermán Taube’s Una de dos
(One or the Other), which was awarded the top jury prize in the festival’s
«Lo nuevo de lo nuevo» competition, and which uses the riots
and demonstrations of 2002 as the backdrop for a plaintive study of everyday
life in a small provincial town. Here, life somehow manages to go on very
much as before, goods and services being transacted on good faith alone,
while the television screens in sidewalk cafes and neighborhood bars broadcast
images of outraged citizens spilling into Buenos Aires’ streets.
Bridging the gap between these two worlds is Martin (sad, blue-eyed Jorge
Sesán), a tattooed taxicab driver who strives to get ahead by moonlighting
as a drug-runner for a powerful Buenos Aires cartel. Back and forth he
goes, from small-town comfort to big-city menace, performing his perilous
highwire act. In-between which, he finds time for a romance with local
girl Pilar (sultry Jimena Anganuzzi) that is touching, erotic and —
perhaps inevitably — doomed. So, in his way, Taube emerges with
a highly-charged political film that is all the more affecting for how
subtly its politics are interwoven with a fine human drama enacted by
a pair of powerfully emotive, physically charged leading actors.
* * *
On a completely different note, Ana Poliak’s Parapalos
(Pin Boy), is a charming fable that deftly mixes fancy and melancholy
as it tells of a young man who comes to work as a pin-setter in a bowling
alley that still maintains a number of manually-operated lanes. The youth,
Ringo (open-faced Adrián Suárez), is something of a novice,
not just at pin-setting, but at life itself. He’s just moved to
the city from the countryside, shares a small apartment with his female
cousin and is generally suffused with the idea that life is full of possibilities.
His colleagues, on the other hand, are a grizzled, eccentric lot —
all twice Ringo’s age or more and resigned to the idea that pin-setting
is all they’ll ever do. And for Nippur, a Shakespeare-quoting ex-hippie
type who’s adorned the back side of the bowling lanes with photos
of Andy Warhol and Janis Joplin, that’s not such a bad thing. He’s
constructed an entire personal ethos around the ins and outs of pin-setting
— «Everything in my life is borrowed, except for freedom,»
he notes — and as he initiates Ringo into the routine, you have
the sense that he’s being indoctrinated into some rarefied, privileged
fellowship.
Over the course of Parapalos’ brief, 90-minute running
time, the bowling alley (where almost every scene in the film is set)
comes to seem an unlikely nirvana, an oasis of calm in a chaotic world
— albeit one in escalating danger of extinction. Already, half of
the alley has been converted to automated lanes that require no human
touch and, Poliak suggests in a series of precisely balanced, head-on
compositions, they may soon stretch from wall to wall. The winner of the
top jury prize in the festival’s official competition, Parapalos
is something of a gentle haiku on the subject of impermanence, put across
by Poliak in an ostensibly minimalist style that conceals a great formal
beauty. The potentially constricting/monotonous space of the film’s
primary location is, in Poliak’s hands, a constantly evolving geography,
so that it is only in the film’s final moments that we feel we really
know what the place looks like. And the bowling pins themselves, lovingly
photographed in their multitude of balletic motions, come to entrance
us with their hypnotic, anthropomorphic grace.
* * *
Last
but hardly least, Buenos Aires offered the world premiere of Lisandro
Alonso’s Los Muertos, which will screen later this month in the
Director’s Fortnight at Cannes. A masterful follow-up to Alonso’s
striking 2001 debut feature, La Libertad, Los Muertos offers a similarly
beguiling mix of fact and fiction as it follows a recently paroled felon
(nonprofessional Argentino Vargas) on the long river journey back to his
adult daughter. The movie begins with a sumptuously dreamy opening shot
of sunlight flickering through dense jungle brush, until the dream turns
into a nightmare, Alonso’s camera coming to rest on the bodies of
two dead children as a shadowy figure, perhaps the killer, slithers through
the frame. As the film progresses, we gather fragments of the story —
enough to know that the man returning home now was the killer of his two
younger brothers way back then, but no more than that.
For as in La Libertad, the strength of Los Muertos lies
in its lyrical silences and in the strange and terrible beauty Alonso
evokes from the synthesis of man and labor and environment. More often
than not, what we see on the screen here appears to be nothing more than
human behavior, unobtrusively observed, as Vargas carefully removes honeycomb
from a beehive or, in the film’s striking set-piece, kills and guts
a goat that he will bring to his daughter as a gift. Yet, Los Muertos
is no casual ethnographic record, but rather something darker and more
unsettling — a movie that, while seeming to do so very little at
all, offers us passage into the haunted recesses of a human soul.
Scott Foundas
© FIPRESCI 2004
top
|
|
|