 |
| coming soon
|
|
 |
Istanbul 2003
Turkish Cinema in 2003: Eclectic Choices, Few Surprises
by Gönül Dönmez-Colin
22. Istanbul International Film Festival offered a wide
selection of films in its National Competition. Veteran filmmakers Ömer
Kavur and Yusuf Kurçenli competed with new comers such as Ümit
Cin Güven and with one of the strongest voices of new Turkish cinema,
Nuri Bilge Ceylan.
Potentially interesting themes such as street children,
child abuse, folklore, tradition, migration and urban and rural dilemmas
were explored using diverse approaches, which were not always successful.
Granted the financial difficulties of the Turkish film industry, which
has had its negative effects in many aspects of filmmaking, there seemed
to be a general lack of creativity and originality, except for some courageous
attempts that showed noteworthy results.
“Sir Çocuklari” (Children of Secret)
by Aydin Sayman and Ümit Cin Güven focused on a pressing social
problem, the street children. However, the lives of these youngsters of
misfortune appeared completely sanitised and their experiences unbelievably
romantic. Despite the fact that these creatures of ill-fortune spent their
days sniffing paint solvent on street corners, they managed to remain
pure, not only spiritually but also physically throughout the film. The
beautiful shots of Istanbul, resembling tourism posters were interspersed
with or without reason. Subplots with little connection to the main plot
resulted in a meandering narrative. The balanced performance of Firat
Tanis in the lead garnered him the Best Actor award of the national jury
in Istanbul as well as Antalya (2002), but the film could have benefited
more from a thorough study of the subject before venturing into transferring
it to screen.
“Gönlümdeki Kösk Olmasa” ( House
of Hearts) by Elisabeth Rygard, a Danish documentarian, was made in Turkey
with a Turkish cast. The director’s keen interest in the Anatolian
folklore and particularly the folk songs and the mystic philosophy was
the underlying motivation of this sincere approach to Turkish peasant
life and the natural performance of the boy as the leading character was
heart rendering. However, the essence was lost somewhere and the issue
of the immigrants that the film purported to expose did not materialise.
“Martilar Açken” (When the Seagulls are
Hungry) by Bülent Pelit , who has a background in television would
have been more suitable to that medium. Depleted metaphors such as the
epileptic hero, the classic themes of prostitute-pimp relations and solidarity
among the downtrodden, interspersed once again with postcard views of
Istanbul brought nothing new. On the plus side, was the convincing performance
of Meral Oguz as the ageing prostitute and the soundtrack of the film,
particularly the theme song, “Martilar Açken”.
Yusuf Kurçenli’s first fiction film since 1994,
“Gönderilmemis Mektuplar” (Unsent Letters) which was
rejected by a large number of the audience as belonging to a totally different
epoch was in some ways an interesting experiment if the director had that
in mind. The film narrated an unrequited love in the tradition of Yesilçam
(a Turkish Hollywood of sorts) melodramas of 1960s and 1970s. The fact
that the main leads were shared by two important stars of that genre,
Türkan Soray (the sultan of Turkish cinema) and Kadir Inanir, added
to the atmosphere of nostalgia, but the film had very little to offer
to today’s audience. A cliché laden dialogue did not help
either.
“Büyük Adam Küçük Ask”
(Hejar), which was banned from entering the competition last year had
a chance to compete this year. Handan Ipekci’s political drama tries
to approach the issue of Turkish and Kurdish relations through an unusual
friendship between a retired Kemalist judge and an orphaned Kurdish girl.
The episodes dealing with the suppression of a language in a literal and
a metaphoric sense are powerful. However, one wonders if scenes such as
the one when the old judge takes the girl on a shopping spree are really
necessary.
“O Simdi Askerde” (He’s in the Army Now)
by Mustafa Altioklar, who has aimed at attracting the largest audience
with films such as “Istanbul Kanatlarimin Altinda” (Istanbul
Beneath my Wings) and “Agir Roman” (Cholera Street) has succeeded
in doing just that. The clever dialogue full of sharp one-liners and the
appearances of popular media figures guaranteed a fun evening for the
local audience, but the foreign guests found little interest in this remake
of remakes on army eccentrics.
Omer Kavur is one of the finest directors of Turkish cinema
with such unforgettable works as “Anayurt Oteli” (Motherland
Hotel) and “Gizli Yüz” (The Secret Face). His latest
work, “Karsilasma” (Encounter) is a psychological drama about
life, love and overlapping destinies. The opening scene in a hospital
ward where patients receive chemotherapy is very powerful, particularly
for the role it plays in determining the destiny of the main character.
The theme of quest that is the overriding metaphor of Kavur’s previous
films is also evident here. The visuals are used to the best advantage.
However, the acting is not very convincing and the twists and turns of
the plot, not intriguing enough to hold the narrative together.
Last but not least is the film of Nuri Bilge Ceyland, “Uzak”
(Distant), which won the Fipresci award as well as the Best Film and Best
Director awards of the national jury. Ceylan’s film is somewhat
of a continuation of his previous films. The rural cousin who was asking
the filmmaker to find him a job in the city in “Mayis Sikintisi”
(Clouds of May) knocks on the door of the protagonist who is a professional
photographer. The smell of his shoes, the aroma of his cheap cigarettes,
the commonness of his language, most of all his presence disturb the urbanite
loner who is set in his ways, which, incidentally are more like circles.
Nothing much happens in the film. The snow changes to slush and one day
the urban cousin removes himself from the unfriendly space. “Uzak”
is a quiet, intimate and unpretentious film about ordinary lives; it touches
deep emotions subtly and leaves the audience with images to reflect, to
turn over and relive after they disappear from the screen. Bilge Ceylan
is no doubt one of the finest representatives of new Turkish cinema.
Gönül Dönmez-Colin
© FIPRESCI 2003
top
|
|
|